All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous editorial and peer-review process to ensure scientific quality and integrity.
Initial Editorial Assessment
Submissions are first evaluated by the editorial office for:
- Scope relevance
- Formatting compliance
- Scientific quality
- Ethical compliance
Manuscripts that do not meet journal standards may be returned without external review.
External Peer Review
Eligible manuscripts are reviewed by independent experts in the relevant field.
Reviewers evaluate:
- Originality
- Methodology
- Scientific accuracy
- Clinical relevance
- Clarity of presentation
Editorial Decision
Based on reviewer recommendations, manuscripts may receive the following decisions:
- Accept
- Minor Revision
- Major Revision
- Reject
The editorial board reserves the right to make the final publication decision.
Revision Process
Authors should respond carefully to reviewer comments and submit a revised manuscript with tracked changes where applicable.